Reassuringly/disappointingly I wasn’t the only person to experience this annoyance. PC Pro published an article on Tuesday: Chrome update takes out Flash. The article highlighted a couple of things that I hadn’t realised:
Google was now ‘sandboxing’ Flash; in other words, any issues experienced with a particular website that uses Flash (e.g. malware) doesn’t spread beyond the tab that is running it.
The Adobe Flash plugin was crashing when there were multiple instances of Flash on a page.
The Google Chrome support forum has been a busy place of late, and I’ve been keeping a close eye on the thread entitled Chrome 10 – Flash Crashes.
At 04:00 this morning (UK-time) Microsoft released the latest version of its Web browser software Internet Explorer 9. Needless to say I didn’t stay up for the launch… although, thanks to my youngest son I was awake at that time.
Why 4am?! Well, seemingly it coincided with the official launch during the South by Southwest (SXSW) conferences and festivals in Austin, Texas.
The road to IE9
I was genuinely excited following the development of IE9. Over the years it’s become almost fashionable to be negative about Internet Explorer; Internet Exploder.
Hey! I have a poster on my wall in the office that says “God made the earth in 1 day and then spent the next 5 trying to make it look good in Internet Explorer 6”. And another that says “Keep calm and debug IE6”.
I found Internet Explorer 7 a disappointment. It fixed some of the IE6 bugs but introduced a few new ones. It was reminiscent of the Philip Larkin poem ‘This be the verse’:
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.
IE8 was an a great improvement over both IE6 and IE7 but it was still lagging in terms of keeping up Web standards.
So IE9 had a lot to live up to if it was to claw back respect in the Web development community. And from what I was reading on the IE9 blog and in the Web-media I was genuinely quite excited about the prospect of a Microsoft browser holding its own alongside Firefox, Opera and Google Chrome.
What’s it like?
Having checked out a couple of the beta releases and the release candidate during the last 6 months or so, my initial excitement was quickly crushed.
Each version of IE9 beta plus the release candidate broke my personal homepage that I run on my ‘localhost’ webserver, installed on my PC.
It wasn’t a huge deal, the code is pretty old now and clunky, but it was very disappointing as it has worked perfectly in IE6, IE7, IE8; Firefox 1.0 – 4.0 RC; Opera 7 – 11.1; Safari 3 – 5; Chrome 1.0 – 10.0; and even some archaic versions of Netscape, so why not IE9?!
In installing the final version this evening, however, I was pleasantly surprised. My homepage now works perfectly in IE9.
IE9 is fast—really fast. It starts in only a few seconds and having checked out a few websites and web applications it handles them at an impressive speed too.
I look forward to checking out IE9 more in the future. In the meantime I welcome their “Internet Explorer 6 Countdown” campaign which is dedicated to ensuring that usage of Internet Explorer 6 drops to less than 1% worldwide. It currently has around 12%.
I didn’t mean to switch from Firefox. I’d been a huge fan of Firefox since before version 1.0 was released. Hey! I even contributed financially to Mozilla’s appeal to raise money for the launch and my name was published with thousands of others in a full-page advert in the NYTimes in December 2004.
But Google Chrome was just so fast.
It started quickly (more quickly than Opera), it rendered Web pages quickly and being built on the WebKit engine it supported Web standards well and supported the latest HTML5 and CSS3 developments.
But since upgrading to Google Chrome 10 (and 10 beta) I’ve had nothing but trouble with the Adobe Shockwave Flash plugin crashing every few websites. Since Chrome 5 (released in June 2010) the Flash plugin now comes built-in to the browser, rather than relying on the separate plugin installation that Firefox, Opera and Internet Explorer use.
It seems that I’m not the only person to experience this, which comes as something of a relief to me. There is currently a discussion on the Google Chrome help forum entitled ‘Chrome 10 – Flash Crashes’ which is making for an interesting read.
One suggested fix/workaround is this:
Go to about:plugins
Click on the [+] Details link (top right).
You’ll see two listings for Shockwave Flash. I’ve got “10.2 r154” and “10.2.r152”. The former is located in C:\Users, the later in C:\Windows\system.
The advice is to disable the built-in version (the C:\Users version).
I’ve been running this workaround all evening and as yet haven’t experienced a crash.
I’ll be watching this issue very closely… who knows, I may be moving to Opera 11.1 for a while very shortly.
Tuesday 15 March: that workaround didn’t last. Shockwave Flash has been crashing again this evening. So I’ve just re-enabled it, if that’s not going to do anything.
Wednesday 16 March: I’ve now updated to the Dev channel as someone said that version 11.0.696.12 dev was working fine for him without Flash crashing.
I haven’t used an advert blocking add-on for my browsers until now, and I haven’t looked back.
In this month’s .net magazine regular journalist Gary Marshall has an article entitled “Shirt happens: When does object handling become outright harassment? Whenever you turn off your ad blocker…”
In the article Marshall described how when browsing from one site to another the adverts… well, followed him!
Being spied on
I’ve had the same experience. You know when you unconsciously just know that something’s not quite right? I had that feeling while browsing the Web a couple of weeks ago.
I tend to ignore adverts on Web pages but this particular one caught my eye. I wish I’d taken a screenshot at the time. It was showing me stuff that I’d been looking at on another site a few minutes before. Not just similar stuff, the exact same items that I’d been looking at.
I felt I was being spied on.
Gary Marshall again:
The ads are new, and they’re known as retargeting. Cookies track what you’ve looked at and follow you around the internet, shouting at you to look at them.
In theory, they’re supposed to offer extra inducements – “I see you looked at this shirt and decided not to buy it. How would you feel if I make it TWO POUNDS CHEAPER! Oh, mercy me, and here I am with a wife and three children to support” – but in practice it’s just the same things you’ve looked at, thrust in your face again and again and again. The implication is that you’re so utterly stupid, you’ll buy any old crap if you see it often enough.
The fact of the matter is that advertising works, and we really are gullible enough to see something on the telly, or glance at it in a magazine or newspaper, and race out to buy it believing that it will help us become happier, more content, more attractive, cool. That’s just the way that we’re wired.
However, these days Jane and I don’t tend to watch much live TV any more. With BT Vision we record most of the programmes we want to watch, and then fast-forward through the adverts.
When listening to the digital music service Spotify I realised the other day that I completely switch off during the adverts. I stop listening, or distract myself with something else.
It’s not a conscious thing. I found myself, the other day, thinking it odd that there had been no adverts while I was listening. And yet I suddenly realised there was an advert playing right now!
I’d just tuned it out.
The same kind of life skill that I see Reuben and Joshua are learning even at the ripe age of two when we tell them that it’s time for bed.
I object to adverts on my clothing. I don’t really like wearing rugby shirts that advertise whisky or stout, because I don’t drink. Why should I be a free advert for alcohol?
I do notice adverts in magazines, though.
I get a lot of emails inviting me to add ads to my blog or website. I always say no. Well, not always, I sometimes write back … but that’s another story for another day.
I always say no because, although they could potentially raise a couple of hundred quid a year adverts on blogs just annoy me so I presume that they will annoy other people too.
Besides, I’d have no control over what was being advertised on my website.
One Firefox add-on that I’ve been playing around with recently is Firescope from SitePoint.
Firescope is an extension to Firebug, which is one of the most useful tools for debugging websites, and essentially adds reference material for HTML and CSS to Firebug.
It shows you code examples of all HTML and CSS elements, how well the various browsers support it (Full, Partial, Buggy or None), and gives you links to more detailed information about each element on the SitePoint reference sites:
This is a welcome addition to Firebug, and will certainly save me time checking the exact syntax of those HTML and CSS elements that I don’t use very often. Even though I have the SitePoint Ultimate Reference guides to HTML and CSS both on my desk at work, and in PDF format on my desktop.