Words and Scotland’s future

Scotland's Future - your guide to an independent Scotland
Scotland’s Future is available to download, read online or order a copy.

As I have been thinking about the issues surrounding the question of Scottish independence I keep finding myself thinking about language and words. I keep finding myself wondering what relationship these words have with reality.

Words, words, words.

I hear language that suggests us vs them. I hear words about strength and security. I hear accusations of fear and scaremongering.

As Fr Pip Blackledge also said in a recent blog post, I don’t hear much listening. I hear a lot of broadcasting, and threats and posturing, bordering at times on aggression. I don’t hear much listening.

The Scottish government white paper Scotland’s Future: your guide to an independent Scotland opens with this vision:

With independence we can make Scotland the fairer and more successful country we all know it should be. We can make Scotland’s vast wealth and resources work much better for everyone in our country, creating a society that reflects our hopes and ambition. Being independent means we will have a government that we choose – a government that always puts the people of Scotland first. (page i)

Now is the time we need to be living out the society we want to become, regardless of which side of the argument we find ourselves on. Already we need to be demonstrating the kind of society that puts one another first, that understands fairness and demonstrates respect and care.

Before I was ordained Fr Gian Tellini told me that if I wasn’t a priest when I went up the aisle at the start of the service then I certainly wouldn’t be one when I walked back down the aisle at the end.

If a majority of Scots vote yes in September then it will still be the same people (those who voted yes and those who voted no) living side by side trying to figure out how we adjust and get on with it. We need to be listening now, and building bridges and developing an understanding and caring of one another’s points of view now, because that is the society we’re going to need after the referendum, regardless of the outcome.

There’s lots more I want to say but I’m going to keep this short and end with this short passage from one of my favourite books, Awareness by Anthony de Mello (Zondervan, 1990) which talks about how we identify with words.

Mark Twain put it very nicely when he said, “It was so cold that if the thermometer had been an inch longer, we would have frozen to death.” We do freeze to death on words. It’s not the cold outside that matters, but the thermometer.

It’s not reality that matters, but what you’re saying to yourself about it.

I was told a lovely story about a farmer in Finland. When they were drawing up the Russian-Finnish border, the farmer had to decide whether he wanted to be in Russia or Finland. After a long time he said he wanted to be in Finland, but he didn’t want to offend the Russian officials. These came to him and wanted to know why he wanted to be in Finland. The farmer replied, “It has always been my desire to live in Mother Russia, but at my age I wouldn’t be able to survive another Russian winter.”

Russia and Finland are only words, concepts, but not for human beings, not for crazy human beings. We’re almost never looking at reality.


Words, words, words, words, how imprisoning they are if they’re not used properly.

That farmer didn’t move! Even if he had decided to label his patch of land ‘Russia’ the winter would not, in reality, have been any more severe than any of the previous he’d experienced there. All that would have changed was the label. But in his mind that label meant harsh winters.

I wonder, what does it really mean to label myself Scottish? Or half-Scottish, half-English (which is what I am)? Or British? Or even northern British? What difference do these labels make to my perception of myself? What difference do these make to how I act and behave? What difference do they make to the reality of who I am: the I, the subjective knower, as opposed to the objective me?

What difference will it actually make whether Scotland is an independent country or remains part of the United Kingdom?

This is a challenge for me, I think, to be careful with my words, to listen more, to understand what others think and feel and fear (and to acknowledge that fear is also a valid response to this situation), and to be on the lookout for the reality behind the labels.

The adventure continues…

Published by

Gareth Saunders

I’m Gareth J M Saunders, 52 years old, 6′ 4″, father of 3 boys (including twins). Enneagram type FOUR and introvert (INFP), I am a non-stipendiary priest in the Scottish Episcopal Church, I sing with the NYCGB alumni choir, play guitar, play mahjong, write, draw and laugh… Scrum master at Safeguard Global; latterly at Sky and Vision/Cegedim. Former web architect and agile project manager at the University of St Andrews and previously warden at Agnes Blackadder Hall.

2 thoughts on “Words and Scotland’s future”

  1. I am half English half Welsh I had Scots & Welsh grandparents. Born and raised in England I took the “Queens Shilling” when I was fifteen. I retired to live in Wales .
    I consider myself British, although I never worked in Wales and paid British Taxes I can only use my Bus pass in Wales.
    Devolution is a fine ideal if you can afford it, in the same way divorce is fine if you can afford it but its a lot more economical and better to stay married.
    I have a local Councillor. Well meaning but unqualified as anything other than a bored busey body. A Welsh Assembly MP, not sure what he is qualified as, other than a “politician” . He works for a Government that costs a fortune, who the majority of Welsh people did not vote for. Even the majority living in Wales did not vote let alone those working in other countries. I have a Westminster MP who has real clout. he gets to vote on issues that affect the whole of UK ( even those only related to Scotland, Ireland or England ). That is unless my Euro MP ( not even sure who she or he is) over-rules him. No country regardless of its GDP can afford that many government bodies. Even if any of them were trained and qualified in the professions they practise, or had time in one post to achieve anything worthwhile.
    I had a pension until a looney unqualified Scots chancellor stole it. He had to pay for all the devolved government in Ireland, Scotland and Wales somehow.
    If all the Scots MP’s had been confined to Scotland the rest of the UK will be better off by far. What about the Scots living and working in the rest of the union why don’t they get a vote? Where will all they soldiers, sailors and airmen in the British forces work? Scotland does not want an armed forces so they would be mercenaries.
    The vote should be given to all British citizens. Do we want Scotland to be part of the UK. Do we want one Government at Westminster. Can the individual parts of the UK financially support devolved, independent, government.
    I suspect the only people who vote for independence are those who have no relatives who lived, worked or been educated outside their borders and have no desire to do so themselves.

  2. “I suspect the only people who vote for independence are those who have no relatives who lived, worked or been educated outside their borders and have no desire to do so themselves.”

    Nope, I know a lot of people who intend on voting ‘yes’ who are:

    a) Not Scottish.
    b) Whose families live in other parts of the UK and further afield.
    c) Have worked outside of Scotland.
    d) Have been educated outside of Scotland.

    I know a lot of people who intend on voting ‘no’ who fall into the same categories.

    Hence, my desire right now to read as much as I can about the issues, and to listen attentively to the hopes and fears of those on both sides.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.