Not so sure fish

Dead fish
Photo by Tome213

When we got my Mum a PC a few years ago (Jane and I were still living in Inverness at the time) I looked around to decide on which Internet Service Provider (ISP) to choose for her. Those were the heady days of v.90 and v.92 dial-up modems and Pay As You Go accounts and there were so many options from which to choose. Broadband wasn’t available and unless you wanted to pay extra for an ISDN line you were pretty much limited to the million-and-one 54kbps narrowband connections on offer.

ISPs

Needless to say I had signed up with a few ISPs, partly out of curiosity, partly to obtain as much free domain space as I could, and partly for resilience: if one network went down then I could still connect using another ISP account. We first signed up with the dial-up account that came built into our first PC: Supanet were Time Computers‘ own ISP. I then signed up for an account with a new ISP called Freenetname who offered a free domain name as part of the deal. We chose www.gareth-and-jane-saunders.co.uk, which served us well. (The domain registration lapsed this year and has been bought by a company in Bavaria!?)

Freenetname are now part of the Madasafish empire. I had one of their accounts for a while too. And then Christian Aid brought out their own ISP called Fish, which was later changed to Surefish (for some legal reason, I think). I had an account with them too: [email protected] was my catchy email address.

Whenever you dialled into Surefish part of the cost of the call was donated towards the work of Christian Aid. It was a good incentive to sign up: help out a Christian charity whenever you were surfing the web. So that’s the ISP that I signed Mum up for. She was one of the last to get the @fish.co.uk email addresses before they moved to @surefish.co.uk.

Tide turn

In the last couple of months Surefish appears to have done some kind of deal with BT Wholesale who it looks like are taking over the running of the network. This means that new dialers need to be installed and new passwords, usernames and email addresses learned. Which is fine … so long as the instructions that are given are clear, concise and user-friendly.

I’m sorry to say that I’ve not found any of that to be true for Surefish — even before the take-over by BT. Their website is infuriatingly difficult to navigate. Simple things like finding your account information is hidden, and the most obvious navigation paths lead you to a form inviting you to sign up. It feels as though they want other people to sign up more than they want to support those users who have already signed up.

Then there are little things like the drop-down menus that don’t work properly in Opera. Which means that if you accidentally move your pointer over the drop-downs you need to perform a page refresh (F5) before you can read on as once the drop-down menus have dropped down that’s the way they remain.

Smooth transition?

I’m meeting Mum in Edinburgh this afternoon. On the phone this morning she said that she’d bring up a print-out of an email she received from Surefish recently. It is detailing the steps she needs to perform in order to make the change from the Surefish dial-up to the new BT one. So I looked up the information on their website.

What a muddle!

On the homepage it says:

Confused about a recent email from surefish? Your questions answered: Click here.

“Click here”?! Have their web designers read NOTHING about good usability practices? But it gets worse. When you do click here you are presented with a mess of information, some of which contradicts itself:

One paragraph reads:

If you have a Mac, or would like to input the dial-up numbers manually, they are as follows: Pay As You Go is 0845 604 0362 and Flat rate is 0808 9933 542

while further down the page you can read:

I have a Mac/I’d like to manually input the new dial up information

We will be publishing that information in the next few days on the surefish website.

Do they not realise that they already have published that information on the very same page? Does no one audit the content that they have? Is there no editorial workflow?

Mum is concerned about how to upgrade the dialer (“whatever that means”). Users shouldn’t have to worry about these things — just given clear, unambiguous instructions on what to do, with the reassurance that their service will not be compromised and will in fact be enhanced by this important step.

So to help Mum out I downloaded the new dialer upgrade application. It comes as a zip file. With two files in it:

  • surefish-payg-Setup.EXE (582 KB)
  • surefish-payg-Installer.EXE (299 KB)

Which one does Mum install? When run they do different things. Does she install them both, and if so which one? They are different file sizes so they are obviously not the same file with different names. And they both imply that they are setup or installation files. Is there a difference between setup and install?

This is a perfect example of usability at its very worst. Surefish might be the most “ethical ISP” but it most certainly isn’t the most “usable ISP”.

Trivial Pursuit

Dog chasing a girl

Just back in from an evening with the newly-formed Toft Terrace Friday Night Games Evening Collective — our inaugural meeting was over a lasagne and game of The Really Nasty Horse Racing Game last Friday.

This evening — after Jane and I managed to blag two bowls of home-made lasagne from our neighbours (and delicious it was too) — we played Trivial Pursuit 20th Anniversary Edition which was won by Team Chairs (Ian and Lisa), with Team Sofa (Iain and Jane) and Team Floor (Gareth and Yvonne) coming joint second.

Bits of pie / wedge / cheese were presented to each of teams upon successfully answering a “piece of pie” question by our local celebrity, Yvonne McKie (pronounced like Mackay), winner of the Anstruther Ladies Tennis Championships 2006. She has a cup to prove it. And everything™.

If you happen to get a chance to play the 20th Anniversary Edition watch out for the green questions. They read as though they were written by someone who’d been taking some kind of mind-altering substance, and simply wanted to record his stream-of-conscience.